1/3/2023 0 Comments Tom petta![]() ![]() Some jurisdictions argue the use of a whip in thoroughbred racing is a vital tool, which does not hurt the horse, but not everyone agrees. 'No way' animal can avoid the painĪustralian Rules of Racing permit the use of the whip a maximum of five times in non-consecutive strides prior to the 100-metre mark and at the rider's discretion after that. If successful, PETA hopes it will mean a ban on whipping in races across the state. The aim of the test case is to prove that standard whipping, as allowed by Australian racing rules, is in contradiction with Tasmania's Animal Welfare Act 1993. PETA does not allege the jockey or Tasracing permitted excessive whipping or anything in breach of the Australian rules. In the documents, PETA alleges that in organising the races in accordance with rules that allow horses to be whipped, and organising the participation of the jockey, Tasracing "enabled, aided, abetted and instigated" the jockey to whip the horses, which was an act of animal cruelty. The charges against Tasracing focus on the fact the racing body allowed the whipping of horses in races. The charges filed against the jockey allege that by whipping the horses during the races, the jockey "caused and was likely to cause unreasonable and unjustifiable pain and suffering to the horses". In a test case, the organisation has filed 14 charges against Tasracing and an Australian jockey for using a whip according to racing standards in two races at Mowbray in Launceston in 2019. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is alleging that whipping, as it is currently allowed by Tasracing, is a form of animal cruelty under Tasmania's Animal Welfare Act 1993. An animal rights organisation has filed criminal charges against Tasmania's peak racing body and a jockey in the hope it can outlaw the use of whips during horse races in the state. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |